serp.fast
Artificial Analysis Search Index logo

Artificial Analysis Search Index

Visit Artificial Analysis Search Index ↗

Same agent, swapped search API: quality, cost and speed

Nathan Kessler
By Nathan KesslerUpdated

Each tool is evaluated against our methodology using public docs, vendor demos, and hands-on testing.

Artificial Analysis Search Index website

What is Artificial Analysis Search Index?

Independent leaderboard from Artificial Analysis that runs one fixed agent over many search APIs and scores each on answer quality, cost per task, and time per task.

Our verdict

Artificial Analysis, better known for its model leaderboards, launched this index on August 18, 2026 to answer a question search vendors usually answer about themselves: which API helps an agent give better answers? The method holds everything else still. The candidate model is always GPT-5.6 Luna (medium). Third-party APIs run inside Stirrup, AA's open-source agent harness, with web_search and web_fetch tools and a 25-turn budget; OpenAI Web Search is the one exception and runs through OpenAI's own tool. The score is an equal-weighted mean of three evals: DeepSearchQA (all 900 tasks, mean F1), a hard 200-question BrowseComp subset, and 600 private AA-Omniscience questions. All the numbers below are AA's. At launch it tested 11 configurations from 7 providers, led by Parallel Search (advanced) at 75, Exa at 74 and Firecrawl at 73, against 33 for the model with no search. The live board (data as of October 19, 2026) covers 27 configurations from 14 providers. Exa Search (auto, dynamic highlights) and Perplexity Search (medium) both show 80, and Octen is fastest at 14.5 seconds per task. Cost per task adds the provider's list-price search spend to the model's token spend, which is closer to your real bill than a per-query price. For a team picking a search API, this is the most direct public comparison available. Two caveats apply. Every result comes from one model in one harness, so a different model or prompt could reorder the middle of the table. And vendors now cite their rank in marketing, so check the live leaderboard rather than a screenshot.

Categories:

Benchmarks are how you separate marketing claims from measured reality. Instead of trusting vendor-reported numbers, benchmarks run the same tasks against every system under a shared methodology and publish the results. For AI product builders picking an agentic extraction or search stack, a trustworthy benchmark is a strong input to the build-vs-buy decision – and a fast way to spot when a category is still too immature to rely on.

Share:

Similar tools

See Benchmarks

Embeddings-based neural search that finds semantically related pages

FreemiumMar 2026AI-Native Search APIs

Proprietary web index built for deep multi-hop agent research

FreemiumMar 2026AI-Native Search APIs

Scores how web search tools lift agent accuracy on research tasks

FreeJul 2026Benchmarks

How Artificial Analysis Search Index compares

Vals AI Web Search

Vals AI also fixes the model and swaps the search tool, but on private legal-research and finance tasks rather than general web questions.

Frequently asked questions

What is the Artificial Analysis Search Index?

It is a public leaderboard from Artificial Analysis that compares search APIs by how well an AI agent answers questions when using each one. AA keeps the model, harness and tasks fixed and changes only the search provider. Each configuration gets a 0 to 100 quality score plus a cost per task and a time per task. It launched on August 18, 2026.

How does Artificial Analysis score each search API?

The index is the equal-weighted average of three benchmarks. DeepSearchQA uses its full 900-task eval split and is graded by F1. BrowseComp uses a hard 200-question subset graded on exact answers. AA-Omniscience uses 600 private factual questions, 100 in each of six domains, graded on accuracy. GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) answers and also grades. Each search returns up to 10 results, and the agent gets 25 turns.

Which search APIs does it cover?

At launch AA covered seven providers in 11 configurations: Parallel, Exa, Firecrawl, You.com, Tavily, Keenable and Brave. As of October 19, 2026 data, it lists 27 configurations from 14 providers, adding Perplexity, Octen, OpenAI Web Search, Nimble, Linkup, TinyFish and DeepSeek. Check the live page for the current list.

Which search API ranks highest?

At launch AA had Parallel Search (advanced) at 75, Exa at 74 and Firecrawl at 73, against a no-search baseline of 33. With October 19, 2026 data, Exa Search (auto, dynamic highlights) and Perplexity Search (medium) both score 80, and AA's own FAQ names Exa as the leader. Rankings move as providers ship new modes, so treat any number as a snapshot.

Is the Artificial Analysis Search Index free?

Yes. The leaderboard, methodology page and launch article are free to read on artificialanalysis.ai. It is not something you install or run, and because the AA-Omniscience questions are private, you can't fully reproduce the scores yourself.

Visit

Artificial Analysis Search Index

Visit